Skip to main content

Charlie Chaplin and White Slavery

 

Medford Mail Tribune, 29th March 1944

In 1912, politician Arthur Lee announced in Parliament that 

"the United Kingdom, and particularly England, is increasingly becoming a clearing-house and depot and dispatch centre of the white slave traffic"

His comment related to a Criminal Law Amendment Bill which was being debated, and which was born of widespread fears around issues of sex trafficking. For more on this, I recommend Julia Laite's book The Disappearance of Lydia Harvey, her appearance on this episode of the History Extra podcast and, if you want even more, this brilliant discussion of the book on the History Workshop podcast. 

While the Bill did not pass, Britain was not the only nation experiencing a similar moral panic, which centred around the notion that white women and girls were being kidnapped or coerced into sex work, usually by 'foreign' men. In the United States, Congress passed the White Slave Traffic Act in 1910, better known as the Mann Act. In essence, the Act made it a felony crime to transport a woman or girl across state lines (or out of the country entirely) for 'immoral purposes'. Immoral purposes could, conveniently, be whatever law enforcement felt it to be, including premarital or interracial sex and (usually Mormon) polygamy. 

In 1913, the Act was used to prosecute African American boxer, Jack Johnson, who had relationships with white women (in 2018, Johnson was, perhaps surprisingly, pardoned by the well-known racial equality campaigner, President Donald Trump). Also in 1913, two men took their mistresses on a jolly to Reno, but their wives reported them to the police. They too were charged under the Mann Act. In 1960, the Mann Act was also used against Charlie Manson when he transported two sex workers across state lines, though the charges were dropped. Some charges under the Act may seem far more reasonable to us in the 21st century, such as the prosecution of Chuck Berry, who took a fourteen-year-old girl out of state for sex and was convicted in 1962. 

Jack Johnson

Charlie Chaplin is another famous example of prosecution under the Mann Act and it all centred around one woman, Joan Barry. She was born in Detroit, Michigan in 1920, though the family moved to New York City five years later. Soon after she graduated High School in 1938, Barry moved across the country to California, where she hoped to pursue an acting career. A short while later, down on her luck, she was arrested for stealing dresses from a department store and, as part of her probation, was forced to go back to New York. Late the following year, Barry returned to California, where she met and began a relationship with a millionaire, J. Paul Getty. He introduced her to his associate, Tim Durant, who worked for a theatrical promoter. He in turn introduced her, in June 1941, to the very well-known director, Charlie Chaplin. 

Joan Barry

The two seemed to get on very well right from the off and by the end of the month Barry was contracted to Chaplin's studio on $75 a week. The two also began a secret sexual relationship. By the close of 1941, Joan Barry had fallen pregnant twice, and both times had undergone a termination, allegedly at Chaplin's insistence. Despite this difficulty, Chaplin cast Barry in an upcoming film, describing to his sons that

"She has a quality, an ethereal something that's marvellous... a talent as great as any I've seen in my whole life"

Sadly, Barry seems to have begun to experience mental health difficulties, allegedly getting drunk and turning up at Chaplin's house in the middle of the night, where she would smash windows if he didn't answer the door. This continued into 1943 and in the June, Barry announced to the media that she was pregnant with Chaplin's child, and her mother filed a paternity suit. Two weeks later, at the age of 52, Chaplin married his 18 year old girlfriend, which probably didn't help his reputation all that much.

Baby Carol Ann was born in the October of 1943. Blood tests were taken which seemed to indicate that Chaplin was not Carol Ann's father but he was still ordered to pay child support when Barry's lawyer had the blood tests ruled inadmissible in court. Chaplin supported Carol Ann until she was 21. To add even more spice to an already sufficiently dramatic story, Chaplin's ex-wife alleged that he had paid government officials to tamper with the evidence and there was no doubt whatsoever that he was Carol Ann's father. 

Allegedly as part of a smear attempt by none other than Communist-Finder General, J. Edgar Hoover, Chaplin was charged under the Mann Act of having transported Barry across state lines for illicit sexual encounters. If convicted, Chaplin faced over twenty years in prison. 

Spokane Chronicle, 4th April 1944

Luckily for Chaplin and sadly for Hoover, the verdict was Not Guilty. Friendly with known Communists and sometimes found hanging out with Soviet Diplomats in LA, there were strong suspicions about Chaplin's political leanings. One Congressman even stated in 1947 that 

"[His] very life in Hollywood is detrimental to the moral fabric of America [...] He should be deported and gotten rid of at once"

In the end, Chaplin had had enough of America and moved to Europe, and America had had enough of Chaplin and revoked his re-entry permit. 

The Tennessean, 14th May 1949 

Chaplin basically managed to get embroiled in two moral/ social panics at the exact same time, which is fairly impressive. The Mann Act and its application is also a great example of the ways in which vague legislation supposedly designed to help women can actually be used to further capitalist and white supremacist agendas. Something for the carceral feminists to consider, maybe.

This post has deviated from my initial plan to stay close to home and talk about the history of British crime, so next week will be back to normal. In fact, I will be talking about university-educated gay Communist spies - what could really be more British?

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wladyslaw Ciechomski (1927-2021): Hero of the Polish Resistance - Part One

This blog is a departure from the usual theme. My partner’s dad, Wladyslaw Ciechomski, known to friends and family as Val, passed away on 18th December 2021. He was quite possibly the most remarkable man that I have met and I want to use this space to pay tribute to him. I will do so in three parts, with the second and third parts telling the story of his time both in the Polish Underground and in Nazi prison camps. There was nothing Val could not turn his hand to, including planning and building an extension to his house, completely by himself. He rewired the house, did the plumbing, fixed his own car, and made beautiful costumes and toys for his children. At one point he even had ambition to build a boat. He carried the scars of his difficult early years but was always stable, capable, and very, very clever. My partner's nickname for him was 'Mr Fix-It'. Val was born just outside Warsaw in 1927 and never knew his mother. Instead, he was raised first by his father and late...

'Deeds not Words': The Suffragette Burning of the Bath Hotel

Evaline Hilda Burkitt In April 1914, thirty-seven-year-old Evaline Hilda Burkitt (known by her middle name) and twenty-two-year-old Florence Tunks undertook an arson campaign. First, the pair set fire to two wheat stacks at a farm in Suffolk, causing £340 worth of damage. Next, they burned down the Pavilion at the Britannia Pier in Great Yarmouth. Finally, on 28th April, they attacked the Bath Hotel in Felixstowe. This last fire caused around £35,000 of damage. Nobody was hurt in any of the blazes and indeed the women had never intended for there to be any casualties. Instead, their arson campaign was part of a wider political struggle which by 1914 had developed a level of militancy which was utterly shocking by the standards of the day. Hilda and Florence were Suffragettes and their aims were simple - they would achieve Votes for Women, using Deeds not Words. Westminster Gazette , 30th May 1914 The two women were tried at the Suffolk Assizes in Bury St Edmunds and they reportedly spe...

'Be a man, and don't hang a woman': The Interwoven Fates of Mr John Ellis and Mrs Edith Thompson

John Ellis Born in Rochdale 1874, John Ellis would try his hand at a variety of occupations, including newsagent and hairdresser, before becoming an assistant executioner in 1901 and eventually Chief Executioner in 1907. Hanging a total of 203 people, Ellis' career spanned twenty-three years and only ended with his resignation in  early 1924. That summer, he was himself in the dock on a charge of attempted suicide, after shooting himself in the jaw. Appearing in court that August, he apparently 'looked very ill, and had two or three days' growth of beard on his face [...] During the proceedings he leaned wearily on the edge of the dock'. Mr Ellis was bound over for twelve months, meaning that he agreed not to repeat the attempt and that if he did, he would be brought back before the court on the original charge. Promising to give up the drinking habit that he claimed had precipitated the suicide attempt, Ellis left court and walked into obscurity.  The Scots...