Skip to main content

Charlie Chaplin and the Body Snatchers


Most people have heard of Burke and Hare, the two Scottish body-snatchers who turned to murder to increase their profits. I won't recount the entire history of body snatching here, especially as Suzie Lennox at
Digging Up 1800 has such a rich amount of material. In essence, body snatching was a response to tight restrictions on anatomical dissection - very few bodies were available for medical students to practice on, and so some individuals made a handsome profit by raiding graves and selling the corpses to medical schools. The illicit trade prompted a number of ingenious methods and contraptions for preventing grave robbers from gaining access, including the 'mortsafes' pictured below, which feature on Digging Up 1800, along with an explanation of their use. More examples can be found here. 



In 1832, Parliament passed the Anatomy Act, which required the registration of anybody practicing anatomy and allowed the dissection of bodies which were unclaimed after death. These were usually paupers who had died in hospitals, prisons, or workhouses. Understandably, many people were distressed by this law, but it did do its bit to curb body snatching.

Almost 150 years after the passage of the Act, on Christmas Day 1977, the 88-year-old filmmaker Charlie Chaplin died in Switzerland. His body was interned in a cemetery overlooking Lake Geneva and his widow and children began to grieve.

Three months later, two men dug him up and carried him away. 


Aberdeen Evening Express, 3rd March 1979

The day after the body-snatching, when the cemetery's gravedigger arrived at work, the theft of Mr Chaplin was discovered. Initially, both the police and Chaplin's family were stumped. A police official was quoted in a newspaper as saying

"We don't know whether this is a macabre kidnapping or the work of madmen"

Eventually, Chaplin's wife, Oona, received a ransom demand, which she dismissed as ridiculous, refusing to hand over any money. Chaplin's lawyer also received ransom demands but again nothing was paid. The family waited. The police, meanwhile, used the ransom demands to begin closing the net. 

Police at the desecrated gravesite


Finally, after two and a half months, the police tracked down the culprits and were able to recover Mr Chaplin's remains, which had been reburied about fifteen miles away from the original place of internment. The two perpetrators of the crime were Roman Wardas, a Polish man, and Gantscho Ganev, who was Bulgarian. 

Coventry Evening Telegraph, 17th May 1978

The pair stood trial in the December of 1978, both for "disturbing the peace of the dead" and attempted extortion. By way of explanation for their deeds, Wardas, who had arrived in the country as a refugee, told the court that

"I left my country in order to be free but found it difficult to get steady work in Switzerland"

The court found that Wardas was the mastermind of the whole plot and that Ganev had only limited responsibility. As such, Wardas was sentenced to four and a half years in prison, while Ganev was given an eighteen month suspended sentence. Mr Chaplin's family had his remains reburied, though this time they used a concrete coffin.


Next week, I am going to tell you another story about Charlie Chaplin from the vaults of criminal history - how he got caught up in the Red Scare and was accused of perpetrating "white slavery".





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

'Deeds not Words': The Suffragette Burning of the Bath Hotel

Evaline Hilda Burkitt In April 1914, thirty-seven-year-old Evaline Hilda Burkitt (known by her middle name) and twenty-two-year-old Florence Tunks undertook an arson campaign. First, the pair set fire to two wheat stacks at a farm in Suffolk, causing £340 worth of damage. Next, they burned down the Pavilion at the Britannia Pier in Great Yarmouth. Finally, on 28th April, they attacked the Bath Hotel in Felixstowe. This last fire caused around £35,000 of damage. Nobody was hurt in any of the blazes and indeed the women had never intended for there to be any casualties. Instead, their arson campaign was part of a wider political struggle which by 1914 had developed a level of militancy which was utterly shocking by the standards of the day. Hilda and Florence were Suffragettes and their aims were simple - they would achieve Votes for Women, using Deeds not Words. Westminster Gazette , 30th May 1914 The two women were tried at the Suffolk Assizes in Bury St Edmunds and they reportedly spe...

Dodgy Evidence Part One: False Confessions (The Cardiff Three)

  In 1988, Stephen Miller was twenty-six years old, with a cocaine addiction and a 'mental age' of eleven. His girlfriend, twenty-year-old Lynette White, was engaged in sex work and used the majority of the money she earned to pay for Miller's addiction (some sources indicate that White earned around £100 a day and gave her boyfriend between £60 and £90). The couple lived together on Dorset Street, Cardiff. In early February 1988, as two criminal cases loomed in which White was expected to appear as a witness, it is believed that she decided to lay low to avoid giving evidence. The charges in both cases were serious - procurement of a thirteen-year-old girl for prostitution and, separately, attempted murder. The first trial was due to begin on 15th February, and a  judge had issued a warrant for her arrest in order to ensure her appearance; by 14th February, White had not made contact with Miller or anybody else for five days.  A fellow sex worker, Leanne Vilday, had...

'The deceased had always evinced the greatest horror of self-destruction when anything of the kind came before him': The Criminal Suicide of Mr Justice Willes

In the last post, I twice quoted Mr Justice James Shaw Willes as he railed against men who held the notion that they had some entitlement to beat their wives. Here, I will explain a little more about him, and explore the ways in which society responded to his suicide, as well as looking at general attitudes towards those who took, or attempted to take, their own lives. Born in Cork in 1814, Willes attended Trinity College, Dublin, graduating in 1836. In 1840, he was called to the bar at Inner Temple. Most famous for his decision in Phillips v Eyre in 1870, Willes also presided over the trial of Constance Kent in 1865. Standing trial for the murder of her 3-year-old half-brother five years earlier, Kent’s story caused a great deal of public speculation. Kate Summerscale’s excellent book, TheSuspicions of Mr Whicher or the Murder at Road Hill Hous e is definitely worth reading to gain an understanding of the case; Summerscale is easily one of the best writers in the genre of historical ...