Skip to main content

Charlie Chaplin and the Body Snatchers


Most people have heard of Burke and Hare, the two Scottish body-snatchers who turned to murder to increase their profits. I won't recount the entire history of body snatching here, especially as Suzie Lennox at
Digging Up 1800 has such a rich amount of material. In essence, body snatching was a response to tight restrictions on anatomical dissection - very few bodies were available for medical students to practice on, and so some individuals made a handsome profit by raiding graves and selling the corpses to medical schools. The illicit trade prompted a number of ingenious methods and contraptions for preventing grave robbers from gaining access, including the 'mortsafes' pictured below, which feature on Digging Up 1800, along with an explanation of their use. More examples can be found here



In 1832, Parliament passed the Anatomy Act, which required the registration of anybody practicing anatomy and allowed the dissection of bodies which were unclaimed after death. These were usually paupers who had died in hospitals, prisons, or workhouses. Understandably, many people were distressed by this law, but it did do its bit to curb body snatching.

Almost 150 years after the passage of the Act, on Christmas Day 1977, the 88-year-old filmmaker Charlie Chaplin died in Switzerland. His body was interned in a cemetery overlooking Lake Geneva and his widow and children began to grieve.

Three months later, two men dug him up and carried him away. 


Aberdeen Evening Express, 3rd March 1979

The day after the body-snatching, when the cemetery's gravedigger arrived at work, the theft of Mr Chaplin was discovered. Initially, both the police and Chaplin's family were stumped. A police official was quoted in a newspaper as saying

"We don't know whether this is a macabre kidnapping or the work of madmen"

Eventually, Chaplin's wife, Oona, received a ransom demand, which she dismissed as ridiculous, refusing to hand over any money. Chaplin's lawyer also received ransom demands but again nothing was paid. The family waited. The police, meanwhile, used the ransom demands to begin closing the net. 

Police at the desecrated gravesite


Finally, after two and a half months, the police tracked down the culprits and were able to recover Mr Chaplin's remains, which had been reburied about fifteen miles away from the original place of internment. The two perpetrators of the crime were Roman Wardas, a Polish man, and Gantscho Ganev, who was Bulgarian. 

Coventry Evening Telegraph, 17th May 1978

The pair stood trial in the December of 1978, both for "disturbing the peace of the dead" and attempted extortion. By way of explanation for their deeds, Wardas, who had arrived in the country as a refugee, told the court that

"I left my country in order to be free but found it difficult to get steady work in Switzerland"

The court found that Wardas was the mastermind of the whole plot and that Ganev had only limited responsibility. As such, Wardas was sentenced to four and a half years in prison, while Ganev was given an eighteen month suspended sentence. Mr Chaplin's family had his remains reburied, though this time they used a concrete coffin.


Next week, I am going to tell you another story about Charlie Chaplin from the vaults of criminal history - how he got caught up in the Red Scare and was accused of perpetrating "white slavery".





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Wladyslaw Ciechomski (1927-2021): Hero of the Polish Resistance - Part One

This blog is a departure from the usual theme. My partner’s dad, Wladyslaw Ciechomski, known to friends and family as Val, passed away on 18th December 2021. He was quite possibly the most remarkable man that I have met and I want to use this space to pay tribute to him. I will do so in three parts, with the second and third parts telling the story of his time both in the Polish Underground and in Nazi prison camps. There was nothing Val could not turn his hand to, including planning and building an extension to his house, completely by himself. He rewired the house, did the plumbing, fixed his own car, and made beautiful costumes and toys for his children. At one point he even had ambition to build a boat. He carried the scars of his difficult early years but was always stable, capable, and very, very clever. My partner's nickname for him was 'Mr Fix-It'. Val was born just outside Warsaw in 1927 and never knew his mother. Instead, he was raised first by his father and late...

'Deeds not Words': The Suffragette Burning of the Bath Hotel

Evaline Hilda Burkitt In April 1914, thirty-seven-year-old Evaline Hilda Burkitt (known by her middle name) and twenty-two-year-old Florence Tunks undertook an arson campaign. First, the pair set fire to two wheat stacks at a farm in Suffolk, causing £340 worth of damage. Next, they burned down the Pavilion at the Britannia Pier in Great Yarmouth. Finally, on 28th April, they attacked the Bath Hotel in Felixstowe. This last fire caused around £35,000 of damage. Nobody was hurt in any of the blazes and indeed the women had never intended for there to be any casualties. Instead, their arson campaign was part of a wider political struggle which by 1914 had developed a level of militancy which was utterly shocking by the standards of the day. Hilda and Florence were Suffragettes and their aims were simple - they would achieve Votes for Women, using Deeds not Words. Westminster Gazette , 30th May 1914 The two women were tried at the Suffolk Assizes in Bury St Edmunds and they reportedly spe...

'Be a man, and don't hang a woman': The Interwoven Fates of Mr John Ellis and Mrs Edith Thompson

John Ellis Born in Rochdale 1874, John Ellis would try his hand at a variety of occupations, including newsagent and hairdresser, before becoming an assistant executioner in 1901 and eventually Chief Executioner in 1907. Hanging a total of 203 people, Ellis' career spanned twenty-three years and only ended with his resignation in  early 1924. That summer, he was himself in the dock on a charge of attempted suicide, after shooting himself in the jaw. Appearing in court that August, he apparently 'looked very ill, and had two or three days' growth of beard on his face [...] During the proceedings he leaned wearily on the edge of the dock'. Mr Ellis was bound over for twelve months, meaning that he agreed not to repeat the attempt and that if he did, he would be brought back before the court on the original charge. Promising to give up the drinking habit that he claimed had precipitated the suicide attempt, Ellis left court and walked into obscurity.  The Scots...